6
Feb
From “Social Media Explained,” via the Forbes Marketshare blog:

SOCIAL MEDIA EXPLAINED:
Twitter: I am eating a #hotdog
Facebook: I like hotdogs
Foursquare: Here is where I eat hotdogs
Hipstamatic: Here’s a vintage pic of my hotdog
YouTube: Here, I am eating a hotdog!
Linkedin: My skills include eating hotdogs
Spotify: Listening to Hotdog
Google+: I work at Google and eat hotdogs

I’ve been seeing this joke make the rounds for the past couple of weeks now, each time with a different main activity (“eating donuts,” “taking a pee,” etc.), but the idea still rings true. It’s a neat little package to help define and describe the “point” of social media that still somehow manages to elude so many. Plus, it good-naturedly mocks the inherent narcissism and self-promotion that goes along with so many of our digital portals… he said on his blog that was named after him.
But— I think we need to also take a look at how other, non-social forms of media might convey this same hot dog-eating idea:
TV: BUY THESE HOT DOGS! Attractive people eat them! HOT DOGS!
Radio: For your FREE hot dog, call 1-866-HOT-DOG. That’s 1-866-HOT-DOG. That number again is 1-866-HOT-DOG. Again, 1-866-HOT-DOG. Call now!
Yellow Pages: AAAA-Brand Hot Dog Sellers! “Look for the quintuple A!”
Spam: Incre@$e Y0ur H0+ D0g $ize in tw0 week$ FREE!
Telemarketer: Are you currently satisfied with your hot dog provider?
Billboard: Hot dogs.
See? These are a lot more annoying. That’s why I’ll take Instagram’s vintage hot dogs pics any day.

From “Social Media Explained,” via the Forbes Marketshare blog:

SOCIAL MEDIA EXPLAINED:

Twitter: I am eating a #hotdog

Facebook: I like hotdogs

Foursquare: Here is where I eat hotdogs

Hipstamatic: Here’s a vintage pic of my hotdog

YouTube: Here, I am eating a hotdog!

Linkedin: My skills include eating hotdogs

Spotify: Listening to Hotdog

Google+: I work at Google and eat hotdogs

I’ve been seeing this joke make the rounds for the past couple of weeks now, each time with a different main activity (“eating donuts,” “taking a pee,” etc.), but the idea still rings true. It’s a neat little package to help define and describe the “point” of social media that still somehow manages to elude so many. Plus, it good-naturedly mocks the inherent narcissism and self-promotion that goes along with so many of our digital portals… he said on his blog that was named after him.

But— I think we need to also take a look at how other, non-social forms of media might convey this same hot dog-eating idea:

TV: BUY THESE HOT DOGS! Attractive people eat them! HOT DOGS!

Radio: For your FREE hot dog, call 1-866-HOT-DOG. That’s 1-866-HOT-DOG. That number again is 1-866-HOT-DOG. Again, 1-866-HOT-DOG. Call now!

Yellow Pages: AAAA-Brand Hot Dog Sellers! “Look for the quintuple A!”

Spam: Incre@$e Y0ur H0+ D0g $ize in tw0 week$ FREE!

Telemarketer: Are you currently satisfied with your hot dog provider?

Billboard: Hot dogs.

See? These are a lot more annoying. That’s why I’ll take Instagram’s vintage hot dogs pics any day.

21
Nov
“It’s a known fact in advertising circles that only idiots click on ads — and yet advertisers still think that click-through rates mean something, and that a higher click-through rate means a better ad.”
- Wired’s Felix Salmon, “The Future of Online Advertising”
That picture above is how I’ve trained myself to see Google search results over the years, and I know I’m not alone. My selective visual filter carries over to most websites, too. The upper edges and right-side columns of content-heavy sites are almost always just piles of useless ads, moving or dancing or automatically playing audio meant to distract me from the real reason I’m on the site in the first place.
Classic paid online ads are at best unengaging and easily-ignored. They are at worst severely irritating and intrusive on my reading experience (you know those ones that start out normal sized then unexpectedly grow to engulf the entire page? Great strategy, guys). But as Felix Salmon’s excellent article above points out, they’re still the most-frequently used gadget in the online advertising toolbox. Why?
Okay, it’s true. They’re fast, easy, relatively cheap, and easily measured. Paid online ads are a great way for a brand to feel like its doing “something” online, without having to commit too much time or too many resources to the endeavor. But you reap what you sow. Like I mentioned before, consumers have trained their online eyes to ignore what they know to be of no use to them, and they’ve gotten really good at it. So what do brands do online now that paid ads are losing their luster? Simple.
Social media. Yes, the go-to. But there’s a reason for that. It’s not costly, it’s a direct pipeline to consumer feedback, and it’s still new enough that it can provide a real edge when done right. For more information on the uses of social media in marketing, see every blog online anywhere.
Third party content. In his article, Salmon mentions the ad he places for his site Counterparties. It’s not a moving picture, antiquated call to action, or dancing alien. It’s a simple widget that provides links to related content on other sites. He provides a useful service to the reader, manages to not annoy him or her, and still gets to make a good impression and track click-throughs for measurement. Example: You’re reading an article about some new feature in Photoshop. There’s a box with a Counterparties logo in the column, but it’s just displaying links to relevant creativity/software/photo-editing content elsewhere online.
Micropayments. Early in the internet’s existence, it was determined that most content would be free to access, but revenues would be derived from ads where possible. Hence the rise of the paid online ad. But we’ve since seen a different system of content support that could work: paying for good stuff in small, bite-size chunks. Look at the relatively new world off apps. It’s been proven that people are willing to pay a few dollars for something useful or fun, or download something for free and then pay to improve it (just ask Zynga). This method is beginning to leak onto the internet as a whole, with Hulu Plus and Netflix and periodical paywalls like that of the New York Times’. I think we’ll be seeing more of this in the future, as traditional online ads continue to lose effectiveness.
Online is still fairly new as an advertising medium, especially when compared to TV or print. But just as those channels have changed and evolved significantly over the years, the internet will evolve and grow and require new approaches. There’s no permanent, silver bullet, eternal solution to effective advertising. This is why branders and marketers need to constantly be driving, experimenting with, and exploring the latest innovations.
Wait, I remembered one silver bullet marketing solution: be damn good, all the time.
30-Day Challenge #17

“It’s a known fact in advertising circles that only idiots click on ads — and yet advertisers still think that click-through rates mean something, and that a higher click-through rate means a better ad.”

- Wired’s Felix Salmon, “The Future of Online Advertising”

That picture above is how I’ve trained myself to see Google search results over the years, and I know I’m not alone. My selective visual filter carries over to most websites, too. The upper edges and right-side columns of content-heavy sites are almost always just piles of useless ads, moving or dancing or automatically playing audio meant to distract me from the real reason I’m on the site in the first place.

Classic paid online ads are at best unengaging and easily-ignored. They are at worst severely irritating and intrusive on my reading experience (you know those ones that start out normal sized then unexpectedly grow to engulf the entire page? Great strategy, guys). But as Felix Salmon’s excellent article above points out, they’re still the most-frequently used gadget in the online advertising toolbox. Why?

Okay, it’s true. They’re fast, easy, relatively cheap, and easily measured. Paid online ads are a great way for a brand to feel like its doing “something” online, without having to commit too much time or too many resources to the endeavor. But you reap what you sow. Like I mentioned before, consumers have trained their online eyes to ignore what they know to be of no use to them, and they’ve gotten really good at it. So what do brands do online now that paid ads are losing their luster? Simple.

Social media. Yes, the go-to. But there’s a reason for that. It’s not costly, it’s a direct pipeline to consumer feedback, and it’s still new enough that it can provide a real edge when done right. For more information on the uses of social media in marketing, see every blog online anywhere.

Third party content. In his article, Salmon mentions the ad he places for his site Counterparties. It’s not a moving picture, antiquated call to action, or dancing alien. It’s a simple widget that provides links to related content on other sites. He provides a useful service to the reader, manages to not annoy him or her, and still gets to make a good impression and track click-throughs for measurement. Example: You’re reading an article about some new feature in Photoshop. There’s a box with a Counterparties logo in the column, but it’s just displaying links to relevant creativity/software/photo-editing content elsewhere online.

Micropayments. Early in the internet’s existence, it was determined that most content would be free to access, but revenues would be derived from ads where possible. Hence the rise of the paid online ad. But we’ve since seen a different system of content support that could work: paying for good stuff in small, bite-size chunks. Look at the relatively new world off apps. It’s been proven that people are willing to pay a few dollars for something useful or fun, or download something for free and then pay to improve it (just ask Zynga). This method is beginning to leak onto the internet as a whole, with Hulu Plus and Netflix and periodical paywalls like that of the New York Times’. I think we’ll be seeing more of this in the future, as traditional online ads continue to lose effectiveness.

Online is still fairly new as an advertising medium, especially when compared to TV or print. But just as those channels have changed and evolved significantly over the years, the internet will evolve and grow and require new approaches. There’s no permanent, silver bullet, eternal solution to effective advertising. This is why branders and marketers need to constantly be driving, experimenting with, and exploring the latest innovations.

Wait, I remembered one silver bullet marketing solution: be damn good, all the time.

30-Day Challenge #17

12
Nov

Big Corporations: Y U No Use Social Media?

Apparently, social media use among major corporations is on the decline. According to a new study, only about 60% of Fortune 500 companies use Twitter and/or Facebook to further brand interaction… and even more surprising, only 25% of the Fortune 500 maintain a company blog. Why have big brands seemingly given up on social media?

  • Lack of immediate returns. It’s the question every social media enthusiast dreads: “What’s the ROI on this stuff?” What’s the ROI on your office phone, Chairman? Social media is a tool that brands can use to engage with their customers immediately, frequently, and meaningfully. It’s not a simple investment with a set end date that will magically make you rich. It’s an ongoing method of communication with the people who write your paychecks: the consumers.
  • They don’t want to associate with “bad” comments. Big companies take big risks when they expose their brands to the potential slings and arrows of the social media community. A few negative comments might pop up on your Facebook wall. You might even see a critical Tweet or two. But while you may feel like these “negative” interactions are hurting your brand, wouldn’t you rather be a part of the dialogue than not? At least you have the chance to respond, refute, and repent if you’re in the game. Discussion of your brand is going to happen whether you want it to or not. You may as well be in the fray.
  • It’s too hard to keep up. Do we need a Google+ profile? What’s foursquare and why does it matter? How do we engage our Facebook fans on a daily basis? This point is actually quite justified— it’s difficult to create and master a social media voice for brands. There are quite a few moving parts, and those parts are ever-changing. But one way that Big Brands can stay on top of things is by declaring and owning one or two different channels. If you want to be a Facebook/Twitter brand, then share and comment your heart out. If you want to own blogging and thought leadership, post regular high-quality updates and engage on similar industry blogs. Yes, it’s tough to keep up with the latest social media trends. But if you pick one outlet for your brand to master and completely own it, your customers will see that you’re serious.

While it may seem like the “social media for big brands” fad is waning, I think it’s just a reorganization of priorities. They’ve all seen how these tools work, and (hopefully) they have people on staff who know how to utilize them for maximum efficiency. Facebook isn’t right for every brand. Twitter can’t be a unilaterally helpful marketing application. It’s up to each individual brand to reflect and determine which aspects of social media are most useful to them. Once we reach this next plane of adoption, I think we’ll be seeing some of the most interesting and unique social media efforts that big brands have launched yet.

30-Day Challenge #8

3
Oct
We’re constantly being reminded that the branding game has changed. Social isn’t just a tactic, it’s a revolution. Conversations are king. But now, it’s finally time to quantify shift in the marketing realm.
Fast Company has teamed up with branding firm Mechania to create The Branding Forward Project, an ongoing brand barometer of sorts that measures exactly how marketeers, creatives, ad men, and other professionals view these revolutionary changes. The project already includes input from hundreds of respected industry types, with more being added every day.
The above image is just a taste of the findings thus far. As you can see, we’re reaching some interesting conclusions. Consistency is out. Engagement and inspiration are in.
The results of the Branding Forward Project are a must-read for anyone even tangentially invested in marketing, social media, and business in general.  

We’re constantly being reminded that the branding game has changed. Social isn’t just a tactic, it’s a revolution. Conversations are king. But now, it’s finally time to quantify shift in the marketing realm.

Fast Company has teamed up with branding firm Mechania to create The Branding Forward Project, an ongoing brand barometer of sorts that measures exactly how marketeers, creatives, ad men, and other professionals view these revolutionary changes. The project already includes input from hundreds of respected industry types, with more being added every day.

The above image is just a taste of the findings thus far. As you can see, we’re reaching some interesting conclusions. Consistency is out. Engagement and inspiration are in.

The results of the Branding Forward Project are a must-read for anyone even tangentially invested in marketing, social media, and business in general.